Left, Sheila Jeffreys, 68, is best known as a lesbian feminist scholar and political activist.
Western women have been tricked
into pursuing power instead of love.
Paradoxically, they never have
been so powerless.
“Any girl who grows to womanhood without knowing that love is her supreme value has been spiritually raped. Feminine spirituality expresses an attitude of spiritual waiting, and tending, and readiness for the meeting with its opposite which is a prerequisite for inner wholeness. Without this she becomes a prey to the masculine within herself, a raging spirit of intellectual or physical activity to which no man can be related, and to which she can in no way relate herself. She is a woman possessed.” Irene Claremont de Castillejo, Knowing Woman: a Feminine Psychology.
by Henry Makow Ph.D.
Feminism is an occult hit job well on its way to neutering and destroying Western women, and Western society with it.
Cabalist Jews and Freemasons are Satanists. They control by degrading and corrupting. Like termites they eat away at the supporting beams of society. Nothing is more important to the survival of society than the family. The family provides us with our roles and identity, as well as necessary emotional and material support. It ensures the young are born, loved and raised properly, and the aged are taken care of. Our family is our link in the chain of eternity.
So the Illuminati went after the women, who they deemed frivolous and feebleminded. It convinced them that marriage and family were “oppressive.” Men toiled in mines and factories and died in war, but somehow women were the ones oppressed.
Satanists needed to interfere in the natural affection and attraction males and females have for each other and for their offspring. Satanists exist to banish love.
A woman’s essence is love, the power to generate love, by loving and being loved in return. This is the source of her power. A woman’s love for her husband and children is the most precious thing in the world. For a man, this love is his greatest treasure.
By allowing herself to be snookered, by pursuing material instead of spiritual power, she has essentially lost the power to love. She can have power or love. She can’t have both.
The handmaiden of feminism, promiscuity, has pretty well finished women off as something the Western man would want to marry. She can’t dedicate herself to a man. She has nothing but her youth and that won’t last.
After she has squandered the 15 years of her peak fertility, she will be left with nothing but a cutthroat 9-5 job. The feminist utopia is strewn with this roadkill.
HOW WOMEN LOVE
A woman loves by consecrating herself to her husband, the father of her children. Women are mediums like copper wires. They carry a man’s energy. The key is their choice of husband. He must be someone she respects and trusts with her life. This is love.
The man must earn this love in courtship. After marriage, he must continue to win her assent. He must continue to take the initiative because, just as women love by acceding, men love by leading, and by possessing them with their love. Women want to be possessed.
It’s only the Communists that are convincing them otherwise. Communism is all about revolution – turning what is healthy and natural on its head. They have also emasculated men.
In order to be a conductor of male energy, a woman must be submissive. This is how women love- by acceding to male demands.
She must allow herself to be possessed, loved, to be an instrument. The male energy flows through her and often finds expression in a child, who is an expression of their unity. (see The Power of Sexual Surrender)
As I often say, heterosexuality is the exchange of female (worldly) power for male power expressed as love. Men want power. Women want love. Heterosexuality is the exchange of the two.
This is how two people become one, the key to intimacy which everyone is seeking. She becomes part of his sense of self.
By brainwashing women to be “strong” and independent, by brainwashing them to see males as oppressors and rapists, Communists (feminists) are psychologically neutering females, making it impossible for them to love men, and to discover themselves as women.
They are deliberately throwing a spanner in the works, turning women into lesbians. This is criminal but these hucksters have convinced the unsuspecting women that they are now “liberated.”
FEMINISTS HAVE BEEN SPIRITUALLY PILLAGED
Women need a man’s love like a flower needs sunshine and water. Men nurture women and women empower men by acquiescing to their reasonable demands. This is the heterosexual dynamic.
Men, if you want to discover if a woman loves you, make a reasonable request and see how she reacts.
What Sheila Jeffreys (above) calls “the eroticization of powerlessness” is heterosexuality. But she is a lesbian who obviously can’t understand that women’s love is her power. She wants to turn all women into lesbians who like her can’t understand that woman’s style, beauty, charm (her femininity) depends on eschewing material power.
A woman who gives herself to her husband is cherished and loved by him and their children. A woman who pursues power in masculine terms is doomed to a life of isolation and bitterness.
Western feminist, you’ve forfeited your most precious gift for nothing. You lack personality. You lack charm. You lack style. You lack substance. You can’t love. You’re not even sexy. And soon you won’t have youth either. You will have nothing.
Western feminists, you’ve been robbed, betrayed by your society, teachers, and political and cultural leaders; and consequently you’ve joined the ranks of traitors. You’ve betrayed your unborn children; your society; your culture; your family and the promise of the future.
It’s hard to feel sorry for you. But, if it’s any consolation, you’ve been fleeced by the best.
First Comment by C – “We are all Communists now…”
As you probably know, the Marxist theorist Walter Benjamin described lesbians as “the heroines of modernism”, by which he meant that modern urban culture had an inevitably masculinizing effect on women – a process he portrayed as progressive.
Reading your excellent piece I was reminded too of the Anglo-Welsh writer Douglas Hyde’s memoir of his membership of the British Communist Party in the 1930s, “I Believed”. Hyde recalled that sexual promiscuity was rampant among his fellow Communists, but the problem for the male communist studs was that they deemed the female members of the party completely “unbedworthy”. Hyde said this was partly because feminine women were mostly not attracted to Communism, and that even when they were, membership of the party – and the promiscuity that went with it – soon masculinized them.
Well in a sense we are all Communists now – the promiscuity of the 1930s commmies was probably tame in comparison with what respectable middle class suburbanites get up to today. And there’s no doubt in my mind that the physical coarsening of modern feminist/SJW female millennials, and their embrace of the crudest forms of machismo – tatoos, piercings, doc marten boots, etc – is directly linked to their parents equally enthusiastic embrace of “sexual liberation” a couple of decades ago.